Push Theory

Physics I am not a degreed scientist. All of my learning is self taught through the reading of all sorts of scientific studies about how the world works and how people fall into that system. I was a poetry major in college and soon realized that there was an affinity and power to the laws of physics that adds natural beauty of any reasoning put through words. Many physics majors took poetry classes and at least I yearned to take physics classics. The Push Theory by blueskybigstar was first conceived of at college around twenty years ago today. I know that there are others out there with the similar idea of push. I have not researched or read any of those theories in their specificities. I have record of my coming up with the idea through personal friends and at the WGA. What makes my theory different is that it attempts to bind quantum physics with general relativity.

Push Theory by John Stephen Blyth

Push Theory looks at gravity at another angle, one that reverses things on its head. It centers itself by pondering the differences between what is matter, what is not matter, and the possibility of the existence of another type of matter. Einstein's theory states that space/time bends in the presence of matter which causes a gravitational field. He theorized that there are things called gravitons which have yet to be discovered. In my opinion, the graviton will never be found because they do not exist in the manner conventionally conceived by scientists.

My theory puts forward the idea that it is quanta which drives all of the forces of nature such as electromagnetism and gravity. Many people felt that neutrinos were weightless, but my question was how could anything exist and not put any kind of force on anything else, a certain amount of weight? Neutrinos are forces which exist out of the range of human sight and require the necessary equipment to measure. Only very few at any time are we able to measure. We have not as yet measured their quantity or ubiquity and we are still figuring out their mass. According to the equations of relativity and the best measurements of our sensors, there is a lot of matter that is unaccounted for in the universe. Some people call it dark matter. My theory is that the missing matter exists in quanta streaming in all directions simultaneously throughout our bodies, the earth, and planetary systems. If we looked at matter as an architect would on the atomic level, perhaps we would better understand the systems of quanta. An architect does not directly work with wood, stone, brick, or metal. He works with space that is geometrical and virtual. He works to find the potential within limited space. The atom is small, but from the point of view of an architect, one can see there is much space in an atom between its electrons and nucleus, enough space for neutrinos to fly through with very little interaction. In fact, I wonder if the Heisenberg principle, the impossibility of predicting the position of the "orbit" of an electron is due to the random forces of neutrino-like forces streaming through the atom. How many neutrinos can fit in one atom of hydrogen? Questions like these need to be answered. To accept my theory one must agree that there are neutrinos and that they stream in all direction in equal quantities at or near light speed. Because neutrinos are coming from all directions, their force is nullified, except when in the presence of matter. Our tables, houses, and bodies, all types of mass are affected by the quanta of the neutrinos which flow through the universe. My theory is that when a neutrino travels through physical mass, there is the smallest frictional interaction between them which is gravity.

Einstein thought that gravity was a pulling force. My theory is that gravity is a pushing force. It is a type of mass which detests other mass. Indeed, a new physical law must be considered which I call the Law of Conservation of Space. Because neutrinos travel in all directions at once, when they encounter mass, the mass blocks their natural pathways, and the resistance causes the neutrinos of opposite ends and directions to pinch the matter into the least amount of space possible so that the more quanta can pass uninhibited of mass. It is simple math to see that any two objects of mass take up less space when pushed together than they were separate. For example, in two bodies of matter, the space between them will have less neutrino interaction pushing them apart than the the neutrinos pushing in. The difference is the gravitational push. The force of the neutrinos that pass through from the outside of the masses will be stronger than the neutrinos pushing them apart because those neutrinos pushing apart have already had to go through the mass and have been weakened or interrupted in time. In the November 27th issue of New Scientist cover article about Maurice Allais, I believe the strange behavior of pendulums during solar eclipses can be explained by this. Space is by definition formless and does not bend. To say that space bends is like saying that zero can be a denominator in a fraction. My theory is Einstein's inverted, quanta pushing rather than space bending to cause pull. An experiment for the future is to weigh something on the far side of the moon and something of the same mass on the near side of the moon. According to my theory the mass on the far side should weigh more than the mass on the near side. This quantum force exerts itself so equally upon matter that it makes the most efficient shape for containing mass in geometry, the sphere. One sphere, a singularity, is the shape that the quantum forces want all matter to take because it is the most efficient form to conserve mass in volume so that there will be less mass to hinder their directional pathways. Gravity is like a cosmic housekeeper that ensures that everything be put into place.

Magnetism is the directed force of what is normally random quanta into ordered streams of force. Gravity is the force of neutrino quanta in their natural random, but equally omnidirectional streaming form. Dyanmos, because of their spinning magnetic fields, cause increased interaction with these neutrinos which excites the production of electrical energy.

In superconductive structures, which are made from heavy metals and/or insulating materials such as glass, neutrino-like quanta must become more ordered in order to pass through. This may explain the Cooper effect of electrons pairing in superconductive fields. The fact that the laws of Newton and general relativity change under superconductive conditions suggests they may change under other extreme conditions.

Black holes, perhaps, can be explained by how the space between the electron and its nucleus collapses to become thousands of times more dense than could exist in this part of the universe. In theory, neutrinos find it increasingly difficult to pass through this type of density and thus increase pressure on the matter.

According to the European Space Agency, their scientists have now shown that an angular accelerated spinning superconducting ring induces a powerful "gravito-magnetic" field supposedly "one hundred million trillion times larger" than General Relativity predicts. They call this the "Gravitomagnetic London Moment." This force can be explained by how the superconducting structure forces order in the pathways the neutrinos pass through. By spinning superconducters at great spped, it may force neutrinos into a directed force which approximates gravity.

What makes mass heavier than other mass such as how lead is heavier than most other elements is because neutrinos must exert more force upon denser material in order to travel through. We know that insulative forms of matter such as glass have special properties with light, electricity, and at very cold temperatures superconductivity. Is it not possible that neutrino quanta must arrange themselves in more ordered form in order to pass through? Radioactivity is the energy released from materials so dense that the neutrino force has incredible difficulty getting through; so, in order to pass, it must take part of the material with it, either by knocking it off or attaching to it in order to become the form of radiation detected in radioactive decay. Decay of all sorts is caused by the neutrinos passing through. An experiment to find out the amount of neutrinos in our part of he universe would be to measure how much mass is displaced by decay in comparison to the mass of neutrinos passing through the material at any one time. From the January 7, 2006 New Scientist, it would seem that Heim's method of measuring mass would be essential to the measurements. An experiment similar to this can also be done by spinning superconductive material and measuring the force exerted by the displacement of atomic mass of the thing spinning in relation to the displacement of space within the atom. This should be able to be measured by the relative speed of the spin of the superconductive material to the speed of the passing neutrinos through the material. If the energy released is the same predicted by the interaction between the material and the neutrinos relative to the space each occupies and their probability of collision, it would be some kind of proof. Once this is figured, we should be able to infer their direct effect on the universe and to determine the quantity, mass, and possible role of them as a kind of ether in the universe.

Light and other forces may piggyback on streams of neutrinos, or may be excited neutrinos following their field or stream of energy